- Joined
- Jul 6, 2016
- Messages
- 199
- Reaction score
- 911
- Points
- 0
Regalian Roleplay Rules
Let it be known to all the peerage and common folk of Regalia that this evening, following the House Kehlen's denunciation of House Tyrannian of the Veer and it's vassal House Winslough of Hinter Calem, House Tyrannian attempted to force the House Kehlen to issue a public apology through use of armed mercenaries. In their shortsightedness, they failed to realize that walking into the well guarded estate of House Kehlen in an effort to threaten the patriarch's life would be met with harsh consequences.![]()
![]()
Their sellsword, Garret Ames, along with the Winslough guardsman Bolverk Sterke-Enn made an attempt on Ser Wulfram Kehlen's life under orders from Lord Gallus Tyrannian of the Veer, Lady Azara Tyrannian of the Veer, and Imperial Sir Winslough of Hinter Calem. The Lady Dianne Black is witness to these crimes and was in fact, threatened herself. As such, the following is requested:
House Kehlen of Redde requests...
It is a tragic day when so called "noblemen" attempt to resolve their disputes without honour and virtue. So are the ways of the pagans the Veer has permitted within it's borders and only now do we truly see how far their corruption has spread.
- House Tyrannian of the Veer be unseated from the Noble Peerage
- House Winslough of Hinter Calem be unseated from the Noble Peerage
- Houses Tyrannian and Winslough be declared heretics, for they have demanded an apology for a statement endorsed by the High Reverend
- That House Tyrannian pay reparations for the damages inflicted to Castle Kronau and its staff
- Houses Tyrannian and Winslough be made to make a public atonement for their blasphemy
Signed,
Ser Wulfram Ernst Kehlen
Lord of the Crown Strait
@MonMarty @OnyxXIII @Aespair @BullyTheScroofy @MantaRey @Jonificus @Fatherland @BleachForTheSoul @Ryria @AptlyRatley @Suicidium @MarquisAlex @FireFan96 @Film_Noir @darkarely @Tiber_ @Mooffins @AlphaInsomnia @Jouster @Eronoc @NightLight12 @Zombiel3ait @seoulmate @Wumpatron @Nudibronch @Dekuras @Last_Link @Nellaphise @HydraLana @Tracenator1
It was temporarily voided so that I could discuss what actually happened with Aespair, but it seems to roughly be our stance still. Neither House Winslough nor House Tyrannian claims any responsibility for anything that may or may not have happened at that point in time. I can post one again if you'd like for reference.@OnyxXIII I see you've deleted the reply from your family here. If that reply is voided, I need to know because that itself was what prompted Rodderick's response. ]]
My apologies for voiding my response; it was posted before anyone told me what had happened IG.Let it be known to all the peerage and common folk of Regalia that this evening, following the House Kehlen's denunciation of House Tyrannian of the Veer and it's vassal House Winslough of Hinter Calem, House Tyrannian attempted to force the House Kehlen to issue a public apology through use of armed mercenaries. In their shortsightedness, they failed to realize that walking into the well guarded estate of House Kehlen in an effort to threaten the patriarch's life would be met with harsh consequences.![]()
![]()
Their sellsword, Garret Ames, along with the Winslough guardsman Bolverk Sterke-Enn made an attempt on Ser Wulfram Kehlen's life under orders from Lord Gallus Tyrannian of the Veer, Lady Azara Tyrannian of the Veer, and Imperial Sir Winslough of Hinter Calem. The Lady Dianne Black is witness to these crimes and was in fact, threatened herself. As such, the following is requested:
House Kehlen of Redde requests...
It is a tragic day when so called "noblemen" attempt to resolve their disputes without honour and virtue. So are the ways of the pagans the Veer has permitted within it's borders and only now do we truly see how far their corruption has spread.
- House Tyrannian of the Veer be unseated from the Noble Peerage
- House Winslough of Hinter Calem be unseated from the Noble Peerage
- Houses Tyrannian and Winslough be declared heretics, for they have demanded an apology for a statement endorsed by the High Reverend
- That House Tyrannian pay reparations for the damages inflicted to Castle Kronau and its staff
- Houses Tyrannian and Winslough be made to make a public atonement for their blasphemy
Signed,
Ser Wulfram Ernst Kehlen
Lord of the Crown Strait
@MonMarty @OnyxXIII @Aespair @BullyTheScroofy @MantaRey @Jonificus @Fatherland @BleachForTheSoul @Ryria @AptlyRatley @Suicidium @MarquisAlex @FireFan96 @Film_Noir @darkarely @Tiber_ @Mooffins @AlphaInsomnia @Jouster @Eronoc @NightLight12 @Zombiel3ait @seoulmate @Wumpatron @Nudibronch @Dekuras @Last_Link @Nellaphise @HydraLana @Tracenator1
That is not the original post here so it doesnt solve the problem. IC actions were taken by my character to the original reply, not one edited to avoid its original meaning.My apologies for voiding my response; it was posted before anyone told me what had happened IG.
The swiftly posted response from House Winslough would actually bear only the comments.
"Ser Leopold Winslough is happy to discuss this with officials should it become necessary, but these charges are preposterous and false. Should House Kehlen persist in taking such blatant and dishonest action against my house - a house which, I remind the public, he attacked without provocation - I will be forced to seek legitimate legal action against his house."
It would, as before, be sealed with a Falcon sigil and posted underneath Kehlen's own declaration.
That was the original meaning of my first post. The other one just added a lot of convoluted (and mistaken) context, which is why I voided it.That is not the original post here so it doesnt solve the problem. IC actions were taken by my character to the original reply, not one edited to avoid its original meaning.
I don't consent to that void because IC actions have already commenced as a result of the original wording of that letter/post. That mistaken context is what drove the reply.That was the original meaning of my first post. The other one just added a lot of convoluted (and mistaken) context, which is why I voided it.
I don't have any backup of the original post, so personally I'm unable to do anything about it.I don't consent to that void because IC actions have already commenced as a result of the original wording of that letter/post. That mistaken context is what drove the reply.
Let me make some minor edits to the new post to reflect that.I don't have any backup of the original post, so personally I'm unable to do anything about it.
Since you're insistent about it, say the one reply was posted, and torn down soon after and replaced.