• Inventory Split Incoming

    MassiveCraft will be implementing an inventory split across game modes to improve fairness, balance, and player experience. Each game mode (Roleplay and Survival) will have its own dedicated inventory going forward. To help players prepare, we’ve opened a special storage system to safeguard important items during the transition. For full details, read the announcement here: Game Mode Inventory Split blog post.

    Your current inventories, backpacks, and ender chest are in the shared Medieval inventory. When the new Roleplay inventory is created and assigned to the roleplay world(s) you will lose access to your currently stored items.

    Important Dates

    • April 1: Trunk storage opens.
    • May 25: Final day to submit items for storage.
    • June 1: Inventories are officially split.

    Please make sure to submit any items you wish to preserve in the trunk storage or one of the roleplay worlds before the deadline. After the split, inventories will no longer carry over between game modes.

Zoos: Inhumane And Cruel, Or Necessary And Helpful

Sully

The Huntsman
Joined
Feb 19, 2014
Messages
95
Reaction score
437
Points
0
Age
30
Location
somewhere beyond the woods
In most opinions, they believe zoos are unnecessary and cruel.

The following is what I found on the internet, both discussing the different sides.

Very Inhumane and Self Serving: Healthy animals shall be free to roam in the wild and not held in captivity for the benefit of the viewing public. One of the primary reasons zoos are in existence is because they generate revenue for local communities and support many people in the field of zoology. In very few cases shall animals be kept in a zoo.....When rehabilitating, caring for sick and injured animals, nursing young that lost mothers, managing endangered species, etc. All others shall be in the wild where they belong....Free of the anxiety typically displayed by pacing in their pens at zoos.

One Word: Extinction Without zoos, many of the species that are around today would have gone extinct by now. Selfish and ignorant acts done by impecunious corporate owners who only care about what is good for them destroy ecosystems and animal populations every single day. Horrible and idiotic acts done by humans have caused the need for animals to be kept in zoos so the species can still have a chance. If problems such as a growing world population and deforestation were not in play, zoos would not be as crucial to an animal's species fight against extinction as they are today. You can thank the corporate leaders we all look up to in today's world for the need of zoos.

It's pretty much Prison They're stuck in a cage all day. They don't get to hunt, mate, or anything natural. They're put into cages 100 times smaller than their natural habitat. Just because you want to see something cute or cool, doesn't mean it deserves this kind of horrific agony. They're forced to do what a trainer says on command. That's not a pet, they are wild animals. Anyone who has any compassion can see this.

When in zoos, the animals are not in their natural habitat Animals are taken from their natural habitats and put into caged places, with limited experience that animals in their natural habitat would obtain. They are enclosed in confined spaces that are not where they are supposed to be so we can gawk at them like we have never seen an animal before. The definition of inhumane is "without compassion for misery of suffering". I think that taking an animal from where they are supposed to be, their HOME, is not very compassionate. In zoos, animals don't learn about survival instincts. They get used to the presence of people and other animals. They don't learn how to hunt for their food. They don't get to exercise like they should. Zoos cannot replicate running around in open woods, fields, ectera. They don't have the survival skills that a normal animal in the wild would. Zoos uproot animals from their homes, and take them to cages so people can gawk at them. That is inhumane. Defiantly.

Zoos save animals Zoos save animals, pure and simple; there is, however, a distinct difference between a real zoo (Bronx, San Diego, DC), and low budget zoos in poorer countries and regions. Zoos are run by scientists an help give safe environments to potentially endangered species, even, in some cases, saving the species.


What do you guys think? Are zoos inhumane?
 
Zoos? Not really - if the animals are well cared for and have a suitably realistic environment where they won't be obviously captive I see nothing wrong with it. Certain creatures (like elephants, great apes, and dolphins) should be either treated as equals to humans in intelligence (they aren't animals) or freed into the wild populations if possible. If not, reservations can always be made to help them live happily. But creatures that ARE animals, they can be kept in a zoo, no harm to it.

Now, if you REALLY want inhumane, take a peak at what some petstores sell in their fish department. People always worry about the big furry creatures like bears and lions, but aquatic life is just as fragile and just as alive. Zoos get massive amounts of money and, at least the ones I accept as perfectly fine, are good to the animals. But when it comes to fish... well, first off, goldfish can live to be 25 years of age (both the mutant bloated 'fancy' goldfish and the more streamlined 'feeder' goldfish) are as intelligent as dogs, and have an adult size of 12in (about as long as your forearm, from wrist to elbow). And yet they are sold as if they were just a throwaway pet, something to be used and discarded. It saddens me to see them sold to people who obviously aren't able to care for them. The same can be said for most fish - the vast majority of fish sold are juveniles, and have 3-100 years of life ahead of them, only to die in someones bowl because no one ever cares about them.

If you can't tell, I'm a fish nut.