• Regalian Roleplay Rules

    1. Roleplay rules apply in this category.
    2. Posts are in-character.
    3. Posts are not anonymous.
    4. Posts and reactions made to posts are public. What your character says or does is known by all other characters. If you would like a reaction to be private, do not post it as a public response to a thread. Roleplay it out on the server!
    5. Out-of-character commentary on threads is not allowed unless it is specifically spoiled or bracketed, and/or highlights additional information for in-character responses.
    6. Meme responses are not allowed. This includes reposting the same content as the poster(s) above, or repeating catch phrases on a post.

  • Inventory Split Incoming

    MassiveCraft will be implementing an inventory split across game modes to improve fairness, balance, and player experience. Each game mode (Roleplay and Survival) will have its own dedicated inventory going forward. To help players prepare, we’ve opened a special storage system to safeguard important items during the transition. For full details, read the announcement here: Game Mode Inventory Split blog post.

    Your current inventories, backpacks, and ender chest are in the shared Medieval inventory. When the new Roleplay inventory is created and assigned to the roleplay world(s) you will lose access to your currently stored items.

    Important Dates

    • April 1: Trunk storage opens.
    • May 25: Final day to submit items for storage.
    • June 1: Inventories are officially split.

    Please make sure to submit any items you wish to preserve in the trunk storage or one of the roleplay worlds before the deadline. After the split, inventories will no longer carry over between game modes.

Reply to thread

A note pinned underneath:


Because I was bidden by name, although I would have preferred not to, I shall offer commentary.


1.) Recommendations to Unionist Clergy for an improved inquest are misdirected. Every priest prefers a different inquest format, each inquest is its own business, there is no handbook for a common process of arriving to one cohesive conclusion because it is merely a vehicle for the personal judgement process of the individual. Some priests do not do inquests, and just go straight to the Writ. I myself hold one-on-one inquests, and failing that, a public forum where the subject is not the target, but a platform of kin in faith. No process is better than another, they are always personal, I do not denounce your suggestions, merely suggest you appropriately aim them at the priests involved, not those who weren't even there like this is some kind of institutional critique.


2.) I would be extremely careful to regurgitate my words to suit whatever rhetorical device you find useful. You aptly quote part of my statement, but not my whole statement, specifically the part where I state that I do not cast judgement on the trial or the conclusion, and that I make no statement in relation to it. The statement amended to the good Elf's post, was purely to criticize their rhetoric, not to create a gotcha moment for you to re-use my rhetoric to attack the judgement of the priests. If you have genuine questions about the application of this rhetoric to faith, you can come find me in the Salvation Temple, but do not use my words to draw into question the work of others, that is not what they are meant for, and does not show a stated curiosity for the tenets, but a willingness to use them as argumentative devices to prove your preferred conclusion.


I am always available at the Salvation Temple for those who seek advice, expansion, elaboration, or an understanding of the concepts of Unionism, under the caveat that the clergy are always just a flawed and equally sinful mortal expression of the immortal divine words of the Gods. I do not have all the answers, no priest has all the answers, and the best we can do is provide peace of mind.


Theo.


Top Bottom