Daily Philosophy 5

[favoured]

Today will be yet another simple one. How restrictive do you think you should be on your members? I mean do you let them talk to all allies? Do you let them handle diplomacy? What do you think you should do with them in terms of building? Should you give them some leeway? Should you tell them exactly what they build and dont let them alter it in any way? Is it worth limiting the member's building style to make it so all the houses match?

 

[Banned]

I have been griefed too many times as a faction leader. I stopped all members doing stuff at one point for the pure sole reason of driving them out of my faction, it worked. Then I was convinced to open it up again as a functioning faction, and I got griefed again. My permissions I allow are now very strictly prohibited to /f access commands.

 

[Froggmann5]

I used to have a faction with only friends I knew IRL. Now, we own an kingdom filled with different villages that usually my friends handle themselves.

 

[Gabriel]

On the greifing part, it mainly depends on how your leadership works with people. Aside from choosing them wisely as well. In my opinion, if they look like Herobrine, they are bound to grief.

 

[Zack9699]

I let my members build, but we have active officers so we just will kick and kill them if they do somthing wrong.